| Author | Message | ||
Spacemac Junior Artist Username: Spacemac Post Number: 766 Registered: 05-2012 Posted From: 157.37.139.188 Rating: N/A |
one identity of bharata i mean | ||
Spacemac Junior Artist Username: Spacemac Post Number: 765 Registered: 05-2012 Posted From: 157.37.139.188 Rating: N/A |
the buddhas references to chariots is uncanny, gopala sutta, vasudeva, shikandi etc words buddha used in his suttas but no word reference to rama or krishna but refers to ikshakaku solar dynasty gayatri mantra, kuru as a once great kingdom etc. so my imagination is before panini gramaticing sanskrit still poetic style sanskrit surviving, and buddhas passing, and society having many new ideas of jains, buddhists, sankyas and all vedic upanishadic school of thoughts, gita brought all of them to one platform and unify common folks to one identity of vharata | ||
Spacemac Junior Artist Username: Spacemac Post Number: 764 Registered: 05-2012 Posted From: 157.37.154.66 Rating: N/A |
It represents a situation where a powerful wrongdoer uses someone completely weak, dependent, or terrified of them to give a fake, forced testimony. It is an invalid, untrustworthy endorsement because the witness has a "gun to their head" and cannot speak the truth pilliki eluka sakshyam.. dont know how it refers to an open free and public db, whom am i threatening | ||
Spacemac Junior Artist Username: Spacemac Post Number: 763 Registered: 05-2012 Posted From: 157.37.142.239 Rating: N/A |
ramayana think is vedic era because all vedic sages mentioned and buddha also mentions that they are indeed vedic sages so 2500 bc of harappan civilization where shiva is started worship, 2500-1200 bc vedic era development anukuntey ramayan must have been around 1200-1000bc. then odyssey is 750 bc homer, mahabharat must be between 750 -350 bc, not sure because I did find some evidence of pre buddhist references, but most of the evidences are post buddha, however panini refers to mahabharat so by his time itself it was there. if buddha and paini gap is around 50 years only. so it could have been. compiled around 450 bc as i think it developed after buddha but during panini time but if not then it must have been already present before buddha for which no references were made by buddha or there are subtle references which will come out in future, either way the current gita has been revised over generations and there could be replacement of vocabulary is my guess because nirvana is a word that closely relates to vedic ideas which buddha popularised and current gita also refers it, for this reason of vocabulary and the intent of gita as a whole i think it is post buddha. kuru was ancient 1200 bc kingdom that is present in buddhism also, buddha is 500 bc romanempire not sure but it is known to the world dates are not important better to focus on teachings. my intensions are that something new in buddhism added by buddha. death and deathless are topics ramayana and buddha eztensively teach regarding immortality https://www.ndtv.com/lifestyle/how-the-ramayana-travelled-to -china-and-why-scholars-see-hanuman-in-the-monkey-king-12239 285/amp/1 ivanni emundi friends, naa kadha vinandi, daanuunchi entoo nerchukovachu can i ask if you are hindu and what are you planning to discuss | ||
Emc2 Legend Username: Emc2 Post Number: 79547 Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 71.163.149.176 Rating: |
Pilli ki eluka sakhyam ani oka sametha Saripoyaru iddaru, already he manipulates so many historic evidences to keep Buddha as answer and you are asking about chronological order He is a fraud and he has mental issues, now he will copy paste so much of a crap 11 | ||
Dma Megastar Username: Dma Post Number: 23684 Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 70.171.227.213 Rating: N/A |
neeku telisinantha lo... ramayan bharat budhdha odyssy roman empire chronologically cheppu individual gaa. archaeological/historical evidences ONLY. - physical evidences - literature Please do not say... verbal stories and documented later. lets go from there. TIA Jai Andhra!! Jai Jai Andhra!!! |
